Cases 171 - 180 of 6,770
Cummings v. Larocco et al
as 2:2023cv08407
Plaintiff:
Carl D. Cummings
Defendant:
(Sheriff) Anthony Larocco, (Med.Director) Donna Henig and (Socail Worker) Ms. Vicktarelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonelly v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv08256
Plaintiff:
Castro Cuadrado Antonelly
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Grivance Officer Nasau County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Wellpath
as 1:2023cv10602
Plaintiff:
Jesus Torres
Defendant:
Wellpath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. County of Westchester
as 1:2023cv09880
Plaintiff:
George Burns
Defendant:
County of Westchester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldson v. Department of Corrections, NYC et al
as 1:2023cv09889
Plaintiff:
Derwin Golden and Derwin Goldson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, NYC, The City of New York and Warden, EMTC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. John Doe OMH Provider et al
as 1:2023cv11184
Plaintiff:
Najay Cummings
Defendant:
John Doe OMH Provider, John Doe/Jane Doe Psychiatrist and John Doe/Jane Doe Pharmacists
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trowell v. Whitefield et al
as 1:2023cv09789
Plaintiff:
Ramziddin S. Trowell
Defendant:
Whitefield, Department of Correction and City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Camba et al
as 1:2023cv08088
Plaintiff:
Jaime L. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Camba and NYC Housing Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2023cv09810
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Griffin
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, C. Nixon, Mandel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Nassau Correctional Dept.
as 2:2023cv08127
Plaintiff:
Mr. Emmanuel Hernandez
Defendant:
Nassau Correctional Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
