Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Bentz v. Manton et al
as 3:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
. Manton, . Huston, M Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cullum v. Pritzker et al
as 2:2022cv02256
Plaintiff:
Detrick Cullum
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Tiffanie Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naydenov v. Doe, et al
as 1:2022cv03527
Plaintiff:
Andre Naydenov
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson et al v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson, Floyd Parker, Jermaine Murphy and others
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Daniel Monti, A Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cullum v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Detrick Cullum
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark, Cherryle Hinthorne, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Sawyer et al
as 3:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
James E. Walker
Defendant:
Sawyer, C/O Dunlap, C/O Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Wills et al
as 3:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Kentes West
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills, Reickart, Wexford Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boswell v. Shah et al
as 3:2021cv01340
Plaintiff:
David M. Boswell, Jr.
Defendant:
Vipin Shah, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Jr et al v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2021cv02807
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #2, Cermak Health Services, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Lorenzo Dwayne Thomas Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) et al
as 3:2021cv00440
Defendant:
Ms Smith, Jane Doe #8, Penny George and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
