Cases 11 - 20 of 134
Hill et al v. Ms. Valdez et al
as 8:2022cv02856
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Hill, Clifford E. Gaynor, Russell E. Lee and others
Defendant:
Ms. Valdez, Warden Roger Hester, Ms. H. Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. J Pay, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv02839
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Hill
Defendant:
J Pay LLC, Zephyrhills Correctional Institution and Roger Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. J Pay, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv24027
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Hill
Defendant:
J Pay, LLC, Zephyrhills Correctional Institution and Roger Hester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Miami-Dade Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv23548
Plaintiff:
Torrance Rogers
Defendant:
Miami-Dade Corrections and Orange County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2022cv14318
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Frazier
Defendant:
Hernandez, Rogers, J. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Tyree et al
as 3:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
C. A. Tyree, Gwava, T. McDarby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Sapp et al
as 3:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Lt. Sapp, Sgt. or Off. Pittman, Sgt. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godhigh v. Rogers et al
as 3:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
W. Rogers, A. McGregor and C. Neel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. NAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BERNARD THOMAS
Defendant:
RYAN NAGEL, DIMITRI WILSON, LIONEL ORTIZ-PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2022cv00755
Plaintiff:
Roger Jackson
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
