Cases 11 - 20 of 450
Gill v. Broton et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
Warden Jennifer A. Broton, Assistant Warden Avery, B. Pavigliqnti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gainous v. Faircloth et al
as 6:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Allen Gainous
Defendant:
Warden Jeremy Faircloth, Administrator Da'more and Lieutenant Miguel Aviles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Withers et al
as 6:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
George Clark
Defendant:
Warden Shannon Withers and George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson, Avion v. Captain Weinrich et al
as 2:2024cv14022
Plaintiff:
Avion Lawson
Defendant:
Warden Robinson, Officer Hill, K. Weinrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Perez, Edelio v. Dr. Cruz et al
as 1:2024cv20298
Plaintiff:
Edelio Gonzalez-Perez
Defendant:
Dr. Cruz, Warden, Unknown K-9 Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Bless v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Bless
Defendant:
Rickie Dixon, Warden of Reception and Medical Center, Carryion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gainous v. Faircloth et al
as 8:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Allen Gainous
Defendant:
Jeremy Faircloth, Administrator Da'more, Lieutenant Miguel Aviles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDREWS v. DIXON et al
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANDREWS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and WARDEN OF APALACHEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Dixon et al
as 8:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, John Doe, Warden DeBell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drummond v. Lim et al
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Drummond
Defendant:
C. Lim, Lt. Jackson, Dr. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
