Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Jones v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2019cv09553
Defendant:
Westchester County, Dr. Raul Ulloa, John & Jane Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keesh v. Quick et al
as 1:2019cv08942
Defendant:
R. Williams, S.A. Coughlin, Rebecca A. Loren and others
Plaintiff:
Tyheem Y. Keesh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Annucci et al
as 1:2019cv06531
Defendant:
Thomms, Anthony Annucci, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Joe N. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philips v. Valhalla County Jail et al
as 7:2019cv02019
Defendant:
George Longworth, Kevin Cheverko, Valhalla County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Philips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commissioner et al
as 1:2018cv11934
Defendant:
Dep. Warden, Ms. Connelly, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coney v. John/Jane Doe
as 1:2018cv11292
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Coney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron-Graham v. City Of New York , et al
as 1:2018cv08906
Defendant:
Supervisor C.O. John/Jane Doe # 1-2, Warden John/Jane Doe # 1, C.O. John/Jane Does #1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Cindra Cameron-Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oldman v. Hallett et al
as 1:2018cv08575
Defendant:
Officer Jane Doe, All acting as agents of NYS and NYCDOC, Correction Officer Unknown Hasangjekaj and others
Plaintiff:
Marquis Oldman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv08438
Defendant:
DOC Officer Burke, John/Jane Doe Supervisors of MDC ##1-20, CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caballero v. Shayna et al
as 1:2018cv01627
Defendant:
Nurse Shayna, ER Dr. Mary, C.O. John & Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Jonas Xavier Caballero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
