Cases 21 - 30 of 48
MCGHEE v. WARDEN et al
as 5:2019cv00408
Defendant:
UNICOR PLANT MANAGER, ASSISTANT WARDEN, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS MCGHEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frye v. Charlotte Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2019cv00753
Defendant:
Charlotte Correctional Institution, K. Williams, Risk Management and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Frye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. SCHOUEST et al
as 5:2019cv00302
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA, L LOPEZ-RIVERA, P MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Agents et al
as 6:2018cv02125
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Dept of H.U.D., Six Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv01457
Defendant:
Jeffrey McClellan, S. Johnson, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lieture Moore and Sovereig King Yahweh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lunt v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv01238
Defendant:
A. Acosta, Dept. of Insurance and Risk Managment, Centurion of Florida, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Lunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douze v. Stamen et al
as 3:2018cv00443
Plaintiff:
Marvin Douze
Defendant:
James A. Stamen, E. Martinez, Corizon Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOERNER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2018cv00261
Plaintiff:
Kim Brian Woerner
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Julie L. Jones, Tom Reimers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOERNER v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
KIM BRIAN WOERNER
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JULIE L JONES, TOM REIMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONCRIEFFE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2017cv00297
Plaintiff:
BASIL MONCRIEFFE
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA , RICK SCOTT , COUNTY MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
