Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Spears v. Shearing et al
as 3:2014cv00811
Plaintiff:
Dion Spears
Defendant:
Dr Shearing, Dr Trost, S A Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daugherty v. Godinez et al
as 1:2014cv04876
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James Daugherty
Defendant:
Salvador A. Godinez, Richard Harrington, Mark Grapperhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roderick T. Allen v. Correctional Officer Bower, et al
as 14-2249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODERICK T. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOWER, Menard Correctional Center, RICHARD HARRINGTON, Warden, Menard Correctional Center, MICHELLE L. GROOVES and others
Booker v. Neff et al
as 3:2014cv00560
Plaintiff:
Joseph Booker
Defendant:
C/O Neff, C/O Gregory, Major Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead v. Harrington
as 3:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
Carl Whitehead
Defendant:
Richard Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz v. Williams et al
as 1:2014cv02750
Plaintiff:
Israel Ruiz
Defendant:
L. Williams, Dr. Schaffer, P. Ghosh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Godinez et al
as 3:2014cv00372
Plaintiff:
Tyrin N Smith
Defendant:
Salbadore A Godinez, Richard Harrington, L Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Harrington
as 3:2014cv00366
Plaintiff:
Byron E Adams
Defendant:
Richard Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Cordrey v. Richard Harrington, et al
as 14-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. CORDREY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD HARRINGTON, Warden at Menard Prison, ALEX JONES, Assistant Warden of Operations at Menard Prison, L. PHELPS, Correctional Officer/Internal Affairs Investigator at Menard Prison and others
Knox v. Shearing et al
as 3:2014cv00193
Plaintiff:
VanDaire Knox
Defendant:
Dr Shearing, Ms Pollion, L Codgn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
