Cases 31 - 40 of 55
McCall v. Circuit City Stores, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv03141
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lee McCall
Defendant:
Circuit City Stores, Inc., Philip J. Schooner, Robert Druse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ochlech v. Mason et al
as 5:2013cv03138
Plaintiff:
Charles William Ochlech, III
Defendant:
(fnu) Mason, K. Aulepp, J. Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Albright (ID 99790) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv03235
Plaintiff:
Shannon Albright
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Raymond Roberts and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denmark-Wagner (ID 93947) v. Correct Care Solutions, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv03169
Plaintiff:
Charles Denmark-Wagner
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Inc., Ray Roberts, (fnu) Lawhorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golston (ID 40507) v. Bloomquist et al
as 5:2012cv03046
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Golston
Defendant:
Ray Bloomquist, James Moore, Brice Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Rice et al
as 5:2011cv03221
Plaintiff:
Gary Matthews
Defendant:
Elizabeth Rice, Ray Roberts, Sam Cline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Roberts et al
as 5:2011cv03218
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Clark
Defendant:
Ray Roberts, Jerry Boyle, Jon Bosch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. McKune et al
as 5:2011cv03155
Plaintiff:
Aldred Blake Neal
Defendant:
David R. McKune, Don Almond, Colette Winkerbauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. McKune et al
as 5:2011cv03082
Plaintiff:
Milo A. Jones
Defendant:
David McKune, Roger Werholtz, Ray Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guiden v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2011cv03031
Plaintiff:
Ronald Guiden
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Sam Cline, Berry Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
