Cases 31 - 40 of 2,627
Donald McDonald v. Cook County, Illinois, et al
as 24-2405
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and KIMBERLY M. FOXX
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. MCDONALD
Williams v. Cook County Jail
as 1:2024cv07025
Defendant:
Cook County Jail
Plaintiff:
Julius Goldie Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hugo et al v. Director Martinez et al
as 1:2024cv06867
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cermak Health Services, Director Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso R. Lopez and Dirk L Hugo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hemphill v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv06584
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County Jail/ C.C.D.O.C.
Plaintiff:
Jerome Hemphill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beck v. Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv06293
Defendant:
E. Cortez, Cook County, J. Quezada and others
Plaintiff:
Anterius Beck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv06166
Defendant:
Dart, Myers, McCray and others
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrios v. C.O. Staff et al
as 1:2024cv06195
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, C.O. Staff and Cook County Jail
Plaintiff:
Moises G. Barrios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cook County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv06033
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Smith
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold III v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv05871
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Office, Thomas J. Dart and Cook County Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sonny et al
as 1:2024cv05805
Defendant:
Rocco, Supv. Fenderson, Cook County IL and others
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
