Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Fontanez v. Feeney et al
as 1:2018cv01718
Plaintiff:
Miguel Fontanez
Defendant:
Patricia Feeney, Sanchez, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontanez v. Marshall et al
as 1:2017cv09925
Plaintiff:
Miguel Fontanez
Defendant:
Marshall, Marsh, Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair et al v. Brann et al
as 1:2017cv07653
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair, Romel Robinson, Dupree Gales and others
Defendant:
Cynthia Brann, Kisa Smalls, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton et al v. Manhattan Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv02589
Plaintiff:
Adam Hamilton, Daheim Salley, Raymond Williams and others
Defendant:
Manhattan Detention Center and Tony Durante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv07610
Plaintiff:
Candace Brown, Tonya Hanner and Carla Scott
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, D.C. Diaz, Warden Delgrosso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Miller et al
as 1:2015cv09561
Plaintiff:
Raysun Smith
Defendant:
Correction Officer S. Miller, Correction Officer T. Tabor, Correction Officer Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKnight et al v. Stanford et al
as 1:2015cv08849
Plaintiff:
Larry McKnight
Defendant:
Tina M. Stanford, P.O. Richardson, Johnson P.O. Beverly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. A.M.K.C. C-95 et al
as 1:2015cv07277
Plaintiff:
Christian Diaz
Defendant:
A.M.K.C. C-95, Bob Barker Co. Inc. and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. A.M.K.C. C-95 et al
as 1:2015cv07161
Plaintiff:
Christian Diaz
Defendant:
A.M.K.C. C-95, M. Mingo and Contracter's of A.M.K.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drew v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv07073
Plaintiff:
Keith Drew
Defendant:
City of New York, Stevenson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
