Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Austin v. Dr. Barnes et al
as 3:2018cv00484
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lavon Austin
Defendant:
Dr. Barnes, E. Valerio, G. Thompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCOY v. DOE 1 et al
as 5:2017cv00303
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCOY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McPhee v. Oscarson et al
as 6:2017cv02010
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rae McPhee
Defendant:
Kenar Oscarson, K. L. Stoner, F. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mercado v. Orange County Corrections Department et al
as 6:2017cv01336
Plaintiff:
Louis Angel Mercado
Defendant:
Orange County Corrections Department, Orange County Corrections Health Services Department, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2017cv00575
Plaintiff:
James C. Bradley
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. DOE et al
as 3:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
Noel George Baker
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. Chaplain et al
as 3:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Samuel Maldonado
Defendant:
Jacksonville Sheriff's Department, Mike Williams, Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. Knight et al
as 3:2015cv01245
Plaintiff:
Sha'Ron L. Mobley
Defendant:
Knight, Samuel E Mason, Warden R.M.C. Lake Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romano v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Michael D. Crews et al
as 3:2015cv01053
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tony Romano
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Michael D. Crews, South Florida Reception Center (S.F.R.C.) Warden John Doe (1), Intake Officer John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fabris v. Lyons et al
as 8:2015cv01223
Plaintiff:
Mario Lee Fabris
Defendant:
Michael L. Lyon, Charles Feldman, Gary G. Felice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
