Cases 41 - 50 of 227
Hart v. Rudolph et al
as 8:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen Hart
Defendant:
Lieutenant Rudolph, Lieutenant Dort, Captain Gallaway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PYLES v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERV LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PYLES and ANTHONY EUGENE PYLES
Defendant:
LEON COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERV LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bargmon v. Armor Correctional Health et al
as 2:2022cv14127
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bargmon
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health, Matthew Peebles, Violet Faria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Sgt. Crandall, Sgt. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Casey
Defendant:
Captain Lee, Sgt. Bostic, D. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sifford v. Sheer et al
as 3:2021cv01282
Petitioner:
Roosevelt Fatuna Sifford
Respondent:
Sergeant Sheer, Unknown DOC Officer, Captain Temlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. Demarraw
as 3:2021cv01268
Plaintiff:
Jashon Mobley
Defendant:
Captain Demarraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEEPLES v. ALLEN et al
as 3:2021cv04646
Plaintiff:
EARL PHILLIP PEEPLES
Defendant:
ALLEN, BROWN, COLONEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLER v. KIGHT et al
as 1:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
JACOB WALLER
Defendant:
SARGEANT JAMES KIGHT, SARGEANT JOHN LORD, CORRECTION OFFICERS JOHN I DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laurencio v. Threemon et al
as 2:2021cv00842
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Laurencio
Defendant:
Officer Threemon, Officer Lens, Sgt Tona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
