Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Rivera v. E.M.T.C. Medical Dept. et al
as 1:2015cv02034
Plaintiff:
John R. Rivera
Defendant:
City of New York , Diaz, Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Cherverko et al
as 1:2015cv00444
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Taylor
Defendant:
Kevin Cherverko, Leandro Diaz, Raul Ulloa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. New York City Department Of Corrections et al
as 7:2014cv06814
Plaintiff:
Orlando Diaz
Defendant:
New York City Department Of Corrections, Luis A. Rivera, Anna M. Kross Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. N.Y.C. Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2014cv06592
Plaintiff:
Arnold Diaz
Defendant:
N.Y.C. Department of Corrections and Rikers Island Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Rikers Island Prison et al
as 1:2014cv06737
Plaintiff:
Anthony Diaz
Defendant:
Rikers Island Prison and Department of Corrections (NYS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Hogan et al
as 1:2014cv02732
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Diaz
Defendant:
Michael F. Hogan, Vincent Miccoli, Steven Ciric and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Hogan et al
as 1:2014cv01875
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Diaz
Defendant:
Michael F. Hogan, Vincent Miccoli, Richard D. Carruthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace et al v. Annucci et al
as 1:2013cv07768
Plaintiff:
Maurice Wallace, Special Housing Unit, Mr. Jones and others
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Andrew Cuomo, Deputy Commissioner and Chief Medical Officer of the New York State DOCS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banchs v. Vega et al
as 1:2013cv06840
Plaintiff:
Christopher Banchs
Defendant:
Jaydeen Vega, Johnny Diaz, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banchs v. Vega et al
as 1:2013cv06627
Plaintiff:
Christopher Banchs
Defendant:
Jaydeen Vega, Johnny Diaz, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
