Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Broadway v. Merck Pharmaceutical Company (Maker of VIOXX drug) et al
as 1:2012cv07627
Plaintiff:
Ellis Broadway, Jr.
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline (Worldwide Business Development), McNeil Consumer Healthcare, Johnson and Johnson Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeJesus v. Ellis et al
as 1:2011cv06846
Plaintiff:
Jaime A. DeJesus
Defendant:
Ellis, McDougal and Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2011cv01767
Plaintiff:
Royan Mitchell
Defendant:
Rodriguez, Campbell, Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Rikers Island C73 et al
as 1:2010cv05448
Plaintiff:
Kemar Wilson
Defendant:
Rikers Island C73, Ellis, Badge # 4908 C.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deponceau v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv02150
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus Deponceau
Defendant:
United States of America, New York State, Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Horn et al
as 1:2009cv10319
Plaintiff:
Edwin Austin
Defendant:
Martin Horn, Dept. of Security of N.Y.C. Correction, Mark Hughe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarif Shabazz v. Pataki et al
as 1:2008cv05961
Plaintiff:
Michael Aziz Zarif Shabazz
Defendant:
George E. Pataki, Glenn S. Goord, Anthony J. Annuci and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bouknight v. Ellis et al
as 1:2008cv05496
Plaintiff:
Vincent Bouknight
Defendant:
Ellis, Gator and Butt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reuben v. Ellis et al
as 1:2007cv06046
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Reuben
Defendant:
Ellis, Reed and Rejouis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutchinson v. LeClaire et al
as 1:2007cv02897
Plaintiff:
John E. Hutchinson
Defendant:
Luciente J. LeClaire, Jr., Brian Fischer, S. Kaplan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
