Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Millsapp v. Moreci et al
as 1:2012cv01234
Plaintiff:
Albert Millsapp
Defendant:
Moreci, Cook County and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carreon v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2012cv00928
Plaintiff:
Edward Leonard Carreon, Jr.
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Cook County and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Monreal et al
as 1:2011cv09039
Plaintiff:
Clarence R Jones
Defendant:
Adam P Monreal, Ed Bower, City of Chicago Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royal v. Dart et al
as 1:2011cv00736
Plaintiff:
Reginald Royal
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Romero, Chicago Police Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv03191
Plaintiff:
Burney Robinson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Chicago Police Dept. and Illinois Dept. Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Doe et al
as 1:2010cv01526
Plaintiff:
William Hall
Defendant:
John Doe, Office of the Chief of Police of the Township of Markham, Jody Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Granville v. Dart et al
as 1:2009cv07767
Plaintiff:
Vernon Granville
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Yu, Cook County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santoyo v. Hudson et al
as 1:2009cv06539
Plaintiff:
Sandro Santoyo
Defendant:
Sheriff Hudson, Sheriff pamon, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hood v. City Of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2009cv06217
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Hood
Defendant:
City Of Chicago Police Department, Cook County Department Of Corrections, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Kubick et al
as 1:2009cv04503
Plaintiff:
Randy Powell
Defendant:
Sgt. Kubick, Rickey Davis, Louis Hopkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
