Prison Condition Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 320
SLOPPY v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00013
Plaintiff: LEE SLOPPY
Defendant: ACOSTA, MICHELLE SCHOUEST, A AEEVEDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BABB v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00003
Defendant: JULIE JONES, E PEREZ and CENTURION EXECUTIVES
Plaintiff: HUBERT BABB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. JONES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00005
Defendant: JULIE JONES, CHRIS HODGSON, SENIOR INSTITUTION CLASSIFICATION OFFICERS and others
Plaintiff: JAMES L TATE, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HASPEL v. JONES et al
as 1:2018cv00251
Plaintiff: MICHAEL HASPEL
Defendant: G LESLIE, NELLIE LAWSON, J ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLICH v. JONES et al
as 4:2018cv00591
Defendant: TARLOS THOMAS, ROBERTS, FAIRLEY and others
Plaintiff: ALLEN ROBERT WILLICH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Haight et al
as 3:2018cv01471
Plaintiff: Alvin Davis
Defendant: Ms. Julie Jones and Sgt. Haight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Prison Rehab Industries & ENT. Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01395
Defendant: Mr. S.B. Rossiter, Mrs. Julie Jone, Mrs. M. A. Lyon and others
Plaintiff: Ronald Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv01352
Defendant: Lt. K. Knight, P. Hunter, Nurse K. Burgin and others
Plaintiff: William Hower Melendez, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Prison Rehab Industries & ENT. Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01288
Defendant: D. F. Manning, L. A. Ridd, Mr. S. Walker and others
Plaintiff: Ronald Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'AMICO v. JONES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00494
Defendant: ROBERT SMITH, RAMON BASSA, N ANANDJIWAH and others
Plaintiff: STEVEN FRANCIS D'AMICO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?