Cases 61 - 70 of 526
Phelps v. Sapp et al
as 3:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Lt. Sapp, Sgt. or Off. Pittman, Sgt. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Selger v. Monroe County Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2022cv10045
Plaintiff:
Scott R. Selger
Defendant:
Monroe County Correctional Facility and Monroe County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. MAY et al
as 5:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WARREN FORD
Defendant:
SCOTT MAY, A RALPH and A MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Miscellaneous Defendants
as 3:2022cv00569
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Scott
Defendant:
Miscellaneous Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hersh v. Scott
as 3:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Ray Hersh
Defendant:
Leroy Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. DICKS et al
as 4:2022cv00130
Petitioner:
JESSIE WIMSY JONES
Respondent:
T. DICKS, Y. L. LEWIS, E. NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Warden Godwin et al
as 3:2022cv00349
Plaintiff:
Saquin Scott
Defendant:
Warden Godwin and Sgt. Kiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. The GEO Group, Inc., et al
as 9:2022cv80298
Plaintiff:
Derrick G. James
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc.,, Assistant Warden Lawrence, Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
FRISK v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT
as 3:2022cv01718
Plaintiff:
LINDSEY SCOTT FRISK, JR
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. All Florida Prison Institutions et al
as 2:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Scott
Defendant:
All Florida Prison Institutions, Reinle Regrole and Charlotte Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
