Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Williams v. Miller et al
as 1:2011cv09675
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Miller and Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lesane v. Bloomberg et al
as 1:2011cv06981
Defendant:
Michael Bloomberg, The City of New York Municipal Corporation, Board of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Lesane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Davis et al
as 1:2011cv01273
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Henry
Defendant:
C.O. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. NYC et al
as 1:2010cv09214
Plaintiff:
Darin B. Poole
Defendant:
NYC, NYC DOC, NYC Dept. of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. NYC et al
as 1:2010cv08691
Plaintiff:
Darin Poole
Defendant:
NYC, NYC DOC, Dep. Matos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. The State of New York
as 1:2010cv05569
Plaintiff:
Terrence Miller
Defendant:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05099
Plaintiff:
Tony Harris
Defendant:
City of New York, Warden C-95, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. John/Jane Doe Co. Department Correctional Officers et al
as 1:2010cv04603
Plaintiff:
Terrence Miller
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe (s) Department Correctional Officers, John/Jane Doe(s) Correction Officers and John/Jane Doe(s) Corrections Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Kalplan et al
as 1:2010cv04402
Plaintiff:
Shoshanna Morgan
Defendant:
Kalplan, Bryant Frischer, Rathgaber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. The New York State Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv04399
Plaintiff:
Shoshanna Morgan
Defendant:
The New York State Department of Corrections, Taconic State Prison and Patrice Ostis
Consolidated_defendant:
The Department of Correction of the State of New York, Rathgaber, Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
