Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Ronser v. DeSousa et al
as 1:2011cv05526
Plaintiff:
Alex A. Ronser
Defendant:
DeSousa, Williams, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rasaun v. Wolf et al
as 1:2011cv05579
Plaintiff:
Rasaun Bullock
Defendant:
Richard T. Wolf, Dora Shapiro, N.Y.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens et al v. T. Hall & Agro et al
as 1:2011cv03763
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Pickens, Vladimir Matos, Dishawn Smith and others
Defendant:
T. Hall & Agro, Castro & Webb, Head of S.R.G. Rodriguez & S.R.G. Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Lutz et al
as 1:2011cv01861
Plaintiff:
Adam Ramos
Defendant:
Lutz and K. Kurek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2010cv01774
Plaintiff:
Vincent Adams
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. NYC Dept. of Health and Mental Hygiene et al
as 1:2010cv00389
Plaintiff:
Richard Washington
Defendant:
The City of New York, Faisai Ali and Adam Bograd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omaro v. Sena et al
as 1:2009cv05909
Plaintiff:
Derrick R. Omaro
Defendant:
Michael Sena, Richard Connors, Adam Sandell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bajana v. NYC Dept. of Corrections Inmate's Account et al
as 1:2009cv05202
Plaintiff:
Victor Bajana
Defendant:
NYC Dept. of Corrections Inmate's Account, Ms. Adams in charge of RICC and Ms. Ciscerro Manager of RICC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Crowley et al
as 1:2009cv04194
Plaintiff:
Adam A. Jamison
Defendant:
Matthew Crowley, Jose Gonzalez, Victor Poejo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Fischer et al
as 1:2009cv02068
Plaintiff:
Jerry Adams
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Glenn Goord, Raymond Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
