Cases 81 - 90 of 410
Graham v. Lankford
as 5:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
James Paul Lankford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Chandra Graham
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Michelle Henderson, James Paul Lankford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Girard et al
as 4:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Edward Dionta White
Defendant:
Officer Girard and City of Tulsa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haas v. Reed
as 4:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Joseph Keegan Haas
Defendant:
Mike Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaquez v. Bowling et al
as 4:2023cv00080
Petitioner:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Respondent:
Cody Smith, Bret Bowling and Deputy Kalavik
Defendant:
Creek County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spensley v. Kuhlman et al
as 5:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Douglas H Spensley
Defendant:
Johnny L Kuhlman, John & Jane Doe(s) and Ronald L Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gill v. GEO Group Inc
as 5:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Malcom Gill
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Michael Boger, Comanche County Hospital Authority doing business as Comanche County Memorial Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Claudio v. Wilkinson et al
as 4:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Claudio
Defendant:
Destiny Wilkinson, Andrew L Vallejo, Michael Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haas v. Cherokee Nation Tribe Chief
as 4:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Joseph Keegan Haas
Defendant:
Cherokee Nation Tribe Chief
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Edward Dionta White
Defendant:
City of Tulsa and Officer Girard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
