Cases 1 - 10 of 1,248
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Barkley et al
as 3:2024cv01456
Plaintiff:
Glen Torres
Defendant:
Officer Barkley, Officer Frye, Nurse Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blakey v. Hinthorne et al
as 1:2024cv01206
Plaintiff:
Carroll Blakey
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne, Tiffany Clark, Kellie Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pawelkowski v. Lawrence Correctional Center et al
as 3:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Leszek Pawelkowski
Defendant:
Lawrence Correctional Center, T Fitzgerald, DeeDee Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barmore v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Barmore
Defendant:
P. Myers, Stevens, M Foureh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milons v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04620
Plaintiff:
Deandree Milons
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Correctional Sergeant Williams and John/Jane Doe #1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Doe 1
as 3:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pyles v. Does
as 1:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
Terry Pyles
Defendant:
John/Jane Does and Joseph Rizzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haslett v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Haslett
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gully v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gully
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources Inc and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
