Cases 1 - 10 of 89
WALKER v. BARNES et al
as 5:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
KAREN K WALKER
Defendant:
BARNES and KIMBREL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOULLARD v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
RANDY L WOULLARD
Defendant:
R QUINN, CHARLES RICKS, DONALD LEAVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doctor v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Armando Jermaal Doctor
Defendant:
Barnes, Brown, James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barn v. Dade Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Robert Barn
Defendant:
Dade Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fridriksson v. Cunningham et al
as 5:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Chance Brogan Fridriksson
Defendant:
Dorris LNU, Aaron LNU, FNU Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steelman v. Yes Care Corp Behavioral Health
as 6:2023cv01705
Plaintiff:
Christopher Steelman
Defendant:
Yes Care Corp Behavioral Health and A. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Pasco County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2022cv02731
Plaintiff:
Joshua Russell Barnes
Defendant:
Pasco County Sheriff's Office, Wellpath Health Care and Pasco County Maintenance Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHARLES v. BARNES et al
as 5:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
STEVENSON CHARLES
Defendant:
PATRICE BARNES, MATTHEW HARD BOWER, GRANBERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONCEPCION-PADILLA v. MAY et al
as 5:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
RICARDO CONCEPCION-PADILLA
Defendant:
WARDEN, SCOTT MAY, SHULA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
