Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cox (ID 98253) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2023cv03228
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cox
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Jeff Butler and Brett Sissell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox (ID 98253) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2023cv03167
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cox
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda and Jeff Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox (ID 98253) v. Zmuda
as 5:2022cv03154
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cox
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Jeff Butler and Tommy Williams
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flemming et al v. Dayoub, et al
as 5:2022cv03066
Plaintiff:
Antonio B. Flemming, James Michael Poterbin, Kurt Kingsley and others
Defendant:
Charles A. Dayoub, United States Marshal Service, (fnu) Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Newton et al v. Hudson et al
as 5:2022cv03011
Plaintiff:
Andre Newton, Miguel Pizarro, Brian Pizarro and others
Defendant:
D. Hudson, Ol Aulepp, (fnu) Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Moore (ID 0105168) v. Taylor et al
as 5:2017cv03070
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Dewayne Moore
Defendant:
Rod Taylor, Jake Cox and Brodan Gaede
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Grote et al
as 5:2015cv03189
Plaintiff:
Dusty James Cox
Defendant:
Stewart Grote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Luellen v. Myers et al
as 5:2015cv03119
Plaintiff:
Eddie O. Luellen, Jr.
Defendant:
Janson Myers, Joe E. Lee, Randy Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2015cv03064
Plaintiff:
Roberto Camacho
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Ross McIlvain, Joe E. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Cunningham et al
as 5:2011cv03215
Plaintiff:
Dusty J. Cox
Defendant:
Ty Cunningham, James Davies, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
