Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Phipps v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06603
Plaintiff:
Danny Phipps
Defendant:
City of New York, The State of New York, Monica Windley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2017cv04622
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Lee
Defendant:
Otis Bantum Correctional Facility and Corizon Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goode v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv03735
Plaintiff:
Maurice A. Goode, Jr.
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Department Of Corrections and Corizon Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv03486
Plaintiff:
Curtis R. Nichols
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Corizon Health & Hospital Corporations, A. Blackmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Stevens et al
as 1:2017cv03249
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Lee
Defendant:
Stevens, Johnson, Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. City of New York Corporation Counsel et al
as 1:2017cv01196
Plaintiff:
Marcus Wilson
Defendant:
City of New York Corporation Counsel, Cuomo, Corizon Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jude v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Steven Jude
Defendant:
The City of New York, Department of Correction, Joseph Ponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv09843
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Goodwin
Defendant:
The City of New York, Jane Doe's, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ponte et al
as 1:2016cv06983
Plaintiff:
Sidney Williams
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Mingo and Corizon-Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackins v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv03510
Plaintiff:
Leonard Jackins
Defendant:
The City of New York, Corizon Medical Professionals John Doe, Corizon Medical Professionals Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
