Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SLUSS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2022cv01867
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DAVID SLUSS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 1:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, DAVID LUKENS, J. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 1:2015cv02143
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, DAVID LUKENS, J. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANSER v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv00867
Plaintiff:
DAVID K. DANSER
Defendant:
GEORGE E. SAMUELS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RODNEY W. CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. SOWERS et al
as 1:2013cv01189
Plaintiff:
DAVID RAY BROWN
Defendant:
RODERICK SOWERS, KATHLEEN S. GREEN, JASON CLEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATTLETON v. SAMUELS
as 1:2013cv00587
Petitioner:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Respondent:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARMON v. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR et al
as 1:2011cv00828
Plaintiff:
DAVID G. GARMON
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, SOUTHEAST REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY, JOSEPH NEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATTLETON v. DOE et al
as 1:2010cv01850
Plaintiff:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOUIS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2010cv01561
Plaintiff:
MULLENS LOUIS
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, RONNIE HOLT, DAVID J. EBBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2010cv00711
Plaintiff:
TONEY HOUSTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HELEN MARBERRY, HATTIE SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
