Cases 1 - 10 of 129
FARNEY v. GEO GROUP
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
GEO GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa, Julio N. v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2024cv80253
Plaintiff:
Julio Nehomar Rosa
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, GEO Group Inc. and South Bay Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Geo Group, Inc et al
as 9:2023cv81331
Plaintiff:
Scotty Santos Diaz
Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc, H. Matos, Marie Michelle Amede and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Massard v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 9:2023cv81228
Plaintiff:
Christian Massard
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Geo Care, Sgt. Ms. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DEXTER v. BURK et al
as 3:2023cv20449
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIE L DEXTER and DEMETRICE L DEXTER
Defendant:
A BURK, J SMITH, G ENGLISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EZELL v. BROWN et al
as 3:2023cv16487
Plaintiff:
ROB ERIC EZELL
Defendant:
BROWN, THE GEO GROUP, TWO UNKNOWN GEO PRISON GUARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venneau v. Behesti et al
as 9:2023cv80666
Plaintiff:
Ernest Joseph Venneau
Defendant:
Behesti, Munning and GEO Group Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Berger v. Baptiest et al
as 3:2022cv01312
Plaintiff:
Jackie Berger
Defendant:
John Baptiest, R. Bassa, Centurion Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPAULDING v. FDOC et al
as 5:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
ROY G SPAULDING
Defendant:
FDOC, GEO, MTC MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. The GEO Group, Inc., et al
as 9:2022cv80298
Plaintiff:
Derrick G. James
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc.,, Assistant Warden Lawrence, Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
