Cases 1 - 7 of 7
White v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2021cv09902
Plaintiff:
Paul White
Defendant:
Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Seven Unknown DOE Agents of DHS/CDF/OASIS/Gloval Tel Link et al, Superintendent Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singh v. Office Director, Hudson County Jail and Field Office Director et al
as 1:2011cv00328
Defendant:
Bureau of Immigration & Custom Enforcement, Detention and Removal Operations, Office Director, Hudson County Jail and Field Office Director and others
Plaintiff:
Sarbjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Rahman v. Office Director, Hudson County Jail and Field Office Director et al
as 1:2010cv05152
Respondent:
Bureau of Immigration & Custom Enforcement, Detention and Removal Operations, Office Director, Hudson County Jail and Field Office Director and others
Petitioner:
Muzibur Rahman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dogra v. Immigration Customs Enforcements et al
as 1:2009cv00065
Petitioner:
Kapil Dogra
Respondent:
Immigration Customs Enforcements, Michael B. Mukasey, Martin D. Herron and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cheng Chan et al v. Immigration Customs Enforcements et al
as 6:2008cv06542
Petitioner:
Chien Cheng Chan
Respondent:
Immigration Customs Enforcements, Michael B. Mukasey, Martin D. Herron and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Henriquez v. George et al
as 1:2008cv10022
Plaintiff:
Mario Arnaldo Henriquez
Defendant:
Robert A. George, Esq., Eva Clark, Esq., Kerry Bretz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hossain v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2008cv00477
Petitioner:
Abdul Khaleque, Zakir Hossain
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and William Cleary
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
