Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Prater v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Randall T. Prater
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Walter A. McNeil, Harry K. Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. MCDONOUGH
as 4:2008cv00393
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JOSEPH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COLEMAN v. MCDONOUGH
as 3:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
LARRY COLEMAN
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoot v. Attorney General of the State of Florida
as 9:2008cv80348
Petitioner:
Timothy J. Hoot
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Florida, Attorney General of the State of Florida, James R. McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SNEED v MCDONOUGH
as 5:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE EUGENE SNEED
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH, S M CULPEPPER, WHITFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOKS v. MCDONOUGH
as 3:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
TAREYAN COOKS
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 5:2007cv00282
Plaintiff:
VINCENT HOWARD
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH, R FLORES, B KENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Melton v. State Of Florida et al
as 1:2007cv23046
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Melton
Respondent:
State Of Florida, Attorney General of the State of Florida and James R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davorn v. Crosby et al
as 3:2007cv01056
Plaintiff:
Davis Julius Davorn
Defendant:
James V Crosby, James R. McDonough, Pilar Tournau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICELI v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 4:2007cv00480
Plaintiff:
CHARLES N MICELI
Defendant:
JAMES R MCDONOUGH, WILLIAM BUCHTMANN, MR WELLHAUSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
