Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Montes v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv04141
Plaintiff:
Germaine Montes
Defendant:
Superintendent Mark Miller, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv05924
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lamar Brown
Defendant:
The City of New York, Warden Ronald Miller, Captain Moses and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Collado et al
as 1:2023cv06971
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gibson
Defendant:
Warden J. Collado, Luis Molina, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Morley et al
as 7:2020cv07381
Defendant:
Nurse Administator Diane Hinton, Dermathologist Miranda Zander, Chief Doctor John Morley and others
Plaintiff:
Sampson Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augustin v. Westchester Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2019cv08558
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Westchester Department of Corrections, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Augustin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv11295
Defendant:
New York City Department Of Corrections, The City of New York, Gloris Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Arkim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Szabo et al v. Mid-Hudson Forensic Psychiatric Center et al
as 7:2016cv07293
Plaintiff:
Jessica C. Szabo, Dawn Dippell and Thomas Aikens
Defendant:
Mid-Hudson Forensic Psychiatric Center, NYS Office of Mental Health, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2015cv07574
Plaintiff:
Ivan Sean Barton
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and John/Jane Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keitt v. John/Jane Doe #4 et al
as 1:2009cv08508
Plaintiff:
Devin Keitt
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe # 1, John/Jane Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
