Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cooke v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00129
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Mary Moody, Carl C. Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baylis v. Morgan et al
as 1:2010cv00518
Plaintiff:
Leonard K. Baylis
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan and Jane or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. McMullen et al
as 1:2010cv00481
Plaintiff:
James E. Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew K. McMullen, George Lancaster and Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2009cv00862
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
C. Danberg, T. Carroll, R. Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bohn v. James T. Vaughn Correctional Center (DCC) et al
as 1:2009cv00420
Plaintiff:
Anton Bohn
Defendant:
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center (DCC), James T. Vaughn DCC Medical Staff, R. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pair v. Danberg et al
as 1:2008cv00458
Plaintiff:
Caleb Pair
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, David K. Holman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Morgan et al
as 1:2008cv00454
Plaintiff:
Albert James Brown
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Mark Emig, Carl Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eaton v. Danberg et al
as 1:2007cv00849
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Eaton
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coley v. Attorney General et al
as 1:2007cv00768
Plaintiff:
Derrick K. Coley
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Delaware, Rafael and Burger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Carroll et al
as 1:2007cv00380
Plaintiff:
Lou Garden Price, Sr.
Defendant:
Tom Carroll, Elizabeth Burris, D. Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
