Cases 1 - 10 of 29
BLAKE v. SAMMIS et al
as 3:2023cv21819
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEONOUR BLAKE
Defendant:
SAMMIS, M LOWE, CATNOCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Lopez
as 3:2023cv00212
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony Lowe
Defendant:
H. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Correctional Officers et al
as 8:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
Shermaine J. Lowe
Respondent:
Correctional Officers and Medical Department Nurse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Correctional Officers et al
as 1:2023cv20499
Plaintiff:
Shermaine J. Lowe
Defendant:
Correctional Officers and Medical Dept. Nurse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Green et al
as 3:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
R. Green, Sgt. Rulevitch, C.O. Mattox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 3:2022cv08831
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA DIANN LOWE
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE ATTORNEY and ALLGOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHEWS v. CITY OF WEWAHITCHKA et al
as 5:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
CARLTON XAVIER MATHEWS
Defendant:
CITY OF WEWAHITCHKA, WESTLY, C LOWE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEJERINETT v. WHITE et al
as 3:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEJERINETT
Defendant:
J WHITE, M LOWE, C PUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bayon v. FCC Coleman - Low et al
as 5:2021cv00431
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
FCC Coleman - Low, Direct TV, Inc., Fox News and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bayon v. Federal Correctional Facility Complex Coleman-Low
as 5:2021cv00404
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Facility Complex Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
