Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Heard v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv00872
Defendant:
Sgt. Hughes, Officer John Doe and Ricky Opsahi
Plaintiff:
Marquis Ezekiel Heard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS RESHAD THOMPSON
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD, JUSTIN BAILEY and GARZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gay v. Leeper et al
as 3:2022cv01020
Plaintiff:
Marquis Deon Gay
Defendant:
Bill Leeper, John Crawford, Melissa Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES et al v. WILLISTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00070
Defendant:
MATTHEW FORTNEY, JOHN SALMEIER, MARQUIS WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL JONES and SHERVONTAY ROUNDTREE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvard v. Blitch et al
as 3:2019cv01147
Defendant:
Austin Merrik, Kyle Knight, T. Tomlin and others
Plaintiff:
Jac'Quann Marquis Harvard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARVARD et al v. INCH et al
as 4:2019cv00212
Plaintiff:
JUAN ESPINOSA, J H, JACQUANN MARQUIS HARVARD and others
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and MARK S INCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duggs v. Hattaway et al
as 3:2016cv00915
Plaintiff:
Marquis Brandell Duggs
Defendant:
Joshua D. Hattaway, Department of Corrections and Julia Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvard v. Landrum et al
as 3:2014cv00580
Plaintiff:
Jac'Quann Marquis Harvard
Defendant:
C. Landrum and Branden Stratton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago v. Taylor et al
as 6:2013cv00894
Plaintiff:
Angel Santiago
Defendant:
Reeshemah R. Taylor, Terrance Thomas, John Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvard v. Landrum et al
as 3:2012cv01196
Plaintiff:
Tac'Quann Marquis Harvard
Defendant:
Landrum, A. Mock, Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
