Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brown II v. Naphcare Healthcare Services et al
as 8:2024cv00936
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Brown, II
Defendant:
Naphcare Healthcare Services and Dr. Ogaga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantrell Dunsmore v. Wells et al
as 8:2023cv01456
Plaintiff:
Denise Cantrell Dunsmore
Defendant:
Rick Wells, Kelly Zeitz, RN, Naphcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bristol v. Gunltier et al
as 8:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
John Afen Bristol, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Gunltier and Naphcare Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkin v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02715
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Mitchell Parkin
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Kurt Hoffman and Brian Meinberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Naphcare Headquarters et al
as 3:2022cv01146
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Johnson
Defendant:
Naphcare Headquarters, Florida Dept of Corrections and Ricky Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. NAPHCARE HEADQUARTERS et al
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS DONTAE and DEMETRIUS JOHNSON
Defendant:
NAPHCARE HEADQUARTERS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Naphcare
as 8:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Perry
Defendant:
Naphcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delacruz v. Deputy Castillo et al
as 8:2021cv01198
Defendant:
Hillsborough County Fire Rescue, Deputy Castillo, Hillsborough Fire Rescue and others
Plaintiff:
Xavier Delacruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Chronister et al
as 8:2020cv00657
Defendant:
Naphcare Inc., Chad Chronister and Brian Christopher Bochert
Plaintiff:
Jessie Thomas Harris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smola v. Ogaga
as 8:2019cv02938
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Smola
Defendant:
Hillsborough County Sheriff Office, Naphcare Medical Department, Ogaga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
