Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rogers et al v. Mears et al
as 1:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
D'Andre R. Rogers, Evan T. Dayton, Jerry McGinnis and others
Defendant:
Warden Truman Mears, Deputy Warden John Beck, Major Marvella Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2012cv00841
Plaintiff:
James F. Taylor
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Mazur, Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Averill v. Celello et al
as 1:2012cv00599
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Averill
Defendant:
Thomas F. Celello, Christina Jones, Robert Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Zeobouty et al
as 1:2011cv00662
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Zeobouty, Gordon, Chelsia Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2010cv00623
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Rogers
Defendant:
Dale Rodgers, Correctional Medical Services, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. JTVCC et al
as 1:2010cv00562
Plaintiff:
Will E. Rogers
Defendant:
JTVCC, JTVCC Medical Dept. and Bay Health Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Markell et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Jack A. Markell, Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
Angel Alvarado
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Rogers and Lisa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Rogers et al
as 1:2008cv00603
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Brooks
Defendant:
Dale Rogers and Rick Kearney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2008cv00539
Plaintiff:
John C. Johnson, William Gregory, Daymien J. Roberts and others
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Rick Kearney, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
