Cases 1 - 10 of 134
RUTLEDGE v. DEVORE-GUIFARRO et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Defendant:
BRACHER, E DEVORE-GUIFARRO, BODIFORD and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE VINCENT RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Rogers et al
as 3:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
W. Rogers, S. Williams, C. A. Tyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROGERS v. RICK et al
as 3:2023cv24697
Plaintiff:
LARRY ROGERS
Defendant:
C RICK, PAUL LEVINS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moretto v. Warden Rogers et al
as 2:2023cv14315
Plaintiff:
Stephen Andrew Moretto
Defendant:
Warden Rogers, Warden Cox, R Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Rogers et al
as 3:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
W. Rogers, S. Williams, C. A. Tyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Young et al
as 3:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
E. S. Young, R. Covey, W. Shomp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Sink et al
as 9:2023cv80460
Plaintiff:
Roger Woods
Defendant:
Ms Sink, Ms Fancie, GEO Care, Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. White et al
as 3:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
Officer White, H. Coovey, E. Prock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIDGES v. APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 5:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
LAQUANN MARVELLE RAPHAE BRIDGES
Defendant:
APALACHEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lee Powers
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Jeffrey McClellan and W. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
