Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Jackson v. Stewart et al
as 1:2022cv07476
Plaintiff:
Taurean O'Keith Jackson
Defendant:
A. Stewart and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv04763
Defendant:
John ? Petrucci, Mr. Schaefler, Mr. Hewett and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Edwards Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeder v. McCabe et al
as 1:2021cv04324
Defendant:
Daniel Stewart, Jim Clyburn, Darren T. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Raszell Reeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windley v. Westchester County et al
as 7:2019cv04858
Plaintiff:
Ian Windley
Defendant:
Penny Stewart, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, Manuel Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv11410
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maldonado
Defendant:
Francis Delgrosso, LaFonda Spaulding, Leandro Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv07216
Plaintiff:
Eric McCormick
Defendant:
Westchester County, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, Leondro Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Westchester County et al
as 7:2018cv07216
Defendant:
Francis Delgrosso, Leondro Diaz, Darnell Flax and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Middleton
Plaintiff:
Eric McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv00990
Plaintiff:
Brian White
Defendant:
Westchester County, Aramark Correctional Services, Kevin D. Cheverko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phipps v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06603
Plaintiff:
Danny Phipps
Defendant:
City of New York, The State of New York, Monica Windley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Aponte
as 1:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Kazhmel Stewart
Defendant:
Aponte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
