Cases 1 - 10 of 505
Moore v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv03119
Plaintiff:
John Moore
Defendant:
State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanke v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2024cv04089
Plaintiff:
Jack Blanke
Defendant:
State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wachter v. Nickel et al
as 3:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Marc Wachter
Defendant:
Andrew Nickel and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeude v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01227
Plaintiff:
Todd Jeude
Defendant:
USA, United States Marshalls Service, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erdmann v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Diane Renee Erdmann
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rokita v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv03084
Plaintiff:
Jason Rokita
Defendant:
State of Illinois, People of the State of Illinois, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Kramer et al
as 4:2024cv04060
Plaintiff:
Hezekiah Whitfield
Defendant:
Kasey Kramer, Jason Garza, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv50111
Plaintiff:
Ronald McKinney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ngang v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01106
Plaintiff:
Edith Ngang
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Parks v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01107
Plaintiff:
Janar Parks
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
