Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Taylor, Daryl v. Dade Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv21651
Plaintiff:
Daryl Taylor
Defendant:
Dade Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 4:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DARRELL DANIELS
Defendant:
TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, JULIE JONES, WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
T. Knox, Newman, Blue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Tifani S. Knox, Richard J. Andrews, R.D. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
CHARLES J DAVIS
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, R TAYLOR, D SELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Henry et al
as 6:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
Ramone Dayne Robinson
Defendant:
Duane Henry, Kadean Wilson, Trevor Persenaire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latini v. Taylor
as 6:2023cv01750
Plaintiff:
Joshua Latini
Defendant:
Steave Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullen v. Crook et al
as 6:2023cv01688
Plaintiff:
Octavias Sullen
Defendant:
Corporal Crook, Officer Gilliam, Corporal Sam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLACK v. HALFORD et al
as 3:2023cv13070
Plaintiff:
DIAMOND KANIEL SLACK
Defendant:
HALFORD, BELL, T ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Putney et al
as 3:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Putney, Holly, Nolles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
