Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Tuten v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Terry Burdette Tuten
Defendant:
Warden, Salyard, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss, British v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv21546
Plaintiff:
British Moss
Defendant:
Terry Browne, Cary Dobson, Angela Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Danny Richard Dustin
Defendant:
Charity Palmer, Ashley Terry, Melissa Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Terry
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Shannon D. Withers, Troy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LOHSTRETER v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2023cv24026
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A LOHSTRETER
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH, TERRY DUDLEY, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. DYAS et al
as 5:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
SEDRICK WASHINGTON
Defendant:
COLE DYAS, EARL B KNOBLES, JR, RICKY MAZINGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin v. Terry et al
as 3:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Danny Richard Dustin
Defendant:
Ashley Terry, Michelle Cook, Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nida v. Martin et al
as 2:2023cv14030
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Nida
Defendant:
Martin and Corizon Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRY v. DAY et al
as 3:2022cv09357
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE TERRY
Defendant:
R DAY and JIMMO D
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALLARD v. SILVERMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE BALLARD
Defendant:
TERRY NATHAN SILVERMAN and JEREMY KRIESEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
