Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Cochran J. v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cochran J. and Ronald J. Cochran
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Warden Scott Ceresini, Warden Brian Emig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Shah v. Corrections, LSP et al
as 1:2021cv00470
Defendant:
William Ngwa, Collette Fomundam, Centurion of Delaware, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kushal Kalpan Shah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby v. Dr. Hernandez et al
as 1:2016cv00331
Plaintiff:
William Davidson Hamby, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Hernandez, Molly O'Toole, Nurse Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaul v. Morgan et al
as 1:2014cv00288
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gaul
Defendant:
Philip Morgan, Mark Emig, Zella Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biddle v. Morgan et al
as 1:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Wayne Biddle
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan, Emig Smith, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drumgo v. Radcliff et al
as 1:2012cv01204
Plaintiff:
De Shawn Drumgo
Defendant:
Radcliff, Enoch Tunamah, Syrita Benson/Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crichlow v. Doe et al
as 1:2012cv00303
Plaintiff:
Keino S. Crichlow
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Commissioner of Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt et al v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2011cv00887
Plaintiff:
William C. Merritt, Jr. and Archie L. Kee
Defendant:
State of Delaware, Troop #6, Brietzke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00129
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Mary Moody, Carl C. Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00073
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, G. Williams, R. Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
