Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Beckel et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04247
Plaintiff:
Andrew W Beckel and Allen M Barnard
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Erik Kunkle, C Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04123
Plaintiff:
George K Martin
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. D.C. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2017cv00669
Plaintiff:
DARRON K. LEE
Defendant:
D.C. PAROLE COMMISSION and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bobby Brown v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 17-1547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGG SCOTT, JOE HANKINS, SHAN JUMPER and others
Rogers v. Liberty Healthcare Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv04233
Plaintiff:
Dothan K. Rogers
Defendant:
Liberty Healthcare Corporation, James Dimas, Gregg Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig Childress v. Karen Smith, et al
as 16-3619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG A. CHILDRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN SMITH, SALLY K. HOUGAS, JOSEPH HANKINS and others
Boatman v Donald Sawyer et al.
as 2:2016mc00008
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, M. Masters, K. Haase and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
John Swanson v. Sandra Simpson, et al
as 16-1234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN SWANSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDRA SIMPSON, Grievance Examiner, sued in her official capacity and individual capacity. and SALLY K. HOUGAS, Security Therapist Aide, sued in her official capacity and individual capacity.
Brown v. Scott et al
as 4:2015cv04208
Plaintiff:
Bobby Brown
Defendant:
Greg Scott, K. Winter, Joe Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04158
Plaintiff:
Dothan K Rogers
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Liberty Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
