Cases 31 - 40 of 77
United States of America v. Approximately $44,200.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2014cv01310
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $44,200.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $3,439.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $7,777.50 seized from Citibank Checking Account Number 40032719714 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Approximately $44,200.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2014at00695
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $44,200.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $3,439.00 in U.S. Currency, Approximately $7,777.50 seized from Citibank Checking Account Number 40032719714 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Approximately $65,534.85 in U.S. Currency seized from First Bank Account 242-5126004, et al
as 2:2014mc00056
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $65,534.85 in U.S. Currency seized from First Bank Account 242-5126004 and Approximately $53,362.51 in U.S. Currency seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account 3584700995
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
USA v. Approximately $143,058.81 in U.S. Currency seized from Wells Fargo Bank Personal Checking Account Number 2065307502, et al
as 2:2014cv00732
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $143,058.81 in U.S. Currency seized from Wells Fargo Bank Personal Checking Account Number 2065307502 and Approximately $173,450.00 in U.S. Currency seized from JP Morgan Chase Personal Checking Account Number 918200346
Claimant:
Jeffrey Scott Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. $721,701.00 Seized from Merrill Lynch Brokerage Account No. '2504 et al
as 8:2014cv00206
Defendant:
$110,344.41 Seized From Wells Fargo Bank Account No '3577, $150,918.00 Seized from Citigroup Global Markets Inc Brokerage Account No '2856, $201,000.00 Seized from Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC Brokerage Account No '8194 and others
Claimant:
Timothy DeCinces
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Approximately $237,600.00 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 9553734865, held in the name of Triple As Sporting Goods et al
as 2:2013mc00053
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $237,600.00 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 9553734865, held in the name of Triple As Sporting Goods and Approximately $1,151.96 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 3445818432, held in the name of Aris C. Toledo
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. $54,719.99 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account ***** 4380
as 8:2013cv00703
Defendant:
$54,719.99 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account ***** 4380
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Approximately $30,000.00 seized from Wells Fargo Bank savings account number 6760837085
as 2:2013mc00035
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $30,000.00 seized from Wells Fargo Bank savings account number 6760837085
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. Approximately $30,000.00 seized from Wells Fargo Bank savings account number 6760837085
as 2:2013at00342
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $30,000.00 seized from Wells Fargo Bank savings account number 6760837085
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. Approximately $86,386.34 in U.S. Currency seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 837-8529088 et al
as 2:2012mc00084
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $86,386.34 in U.S. Currency seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 837-8529088, Approximately $75,799.17 in U.S. Currency seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 237-4897144, Approximately $12,487.89 in U.S. Currency seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 837-7300564 and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
