Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United States of America v. Kansara
as 3:2023cv03470
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Himanshu P Kansara and Himanshu P. Kansara
United States of America v. One Smith and Wesson 442 Airweight Revolver, Serial Number DJT8634 et al
as 5:2019cv00298
Defendant:
One Smith and Wesson 442 Airweight Revolver, Serial Number DJT8634 and One Smith and Wesson M and P Shield Pistol, Serial Number HMJ8509
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Jessica Franco
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Smith & Wesson M&P 40 Pistol, Cal: 40, SN: MPB3664 et al
as 3:2013cv01230
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Smith & Wesson M&P 40 Pistol, Cal: 40, SN: MPB3664, Hipoint 995 Rifle, Cal: 9, SN: E92960, Romarm/Cugir Wasr-10 Rifle, Cal: 762, SN: 1974FH2887 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Approximately $50,001.71 in U.S. Currency, seized from Safe Credit Union Personal Savings Account Number 409977-0
as 2:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $50,001.71 in U.S. Currency, seized from Safe Credit Union Personal Savings Account Number 409977-0
Claimant:
Mike P Baddley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $175,982.21 In U S Currency
as 2:2011cv08852
Defendant:
175,982.21 In U S Currency
Claimant:
Kristian P Kratz and Pacific Coast Hydroponics Inc
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Maple Pacific, Corp. v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv06453
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Robert P. Thiery, United States Customs Service and others
Plaintiff:
Maple Pacific, Corp.
Federal Trade Commission v. Ultralife Fitness, Inc et al
as 2:2008cv07655
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Ultralife Fitness, Inc, Tru Genix Laboratories, LLC, Neil P. Wardle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
