Cases 91 - 100 of 964
Wright et al v. Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11687
Plaintiff:
Bryan Wright and Alana Fadely
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Salas v. Unifirst Corporation
as 1:2022cv11634
Plaintiff:
Jessica Salas
Defendant:
Unifirst Corporation
Conboy v. City of Medford
as 1:2022cv11973
Plaintiff:
Allison Conboy
Defendant:
City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Walsh v. Liams Home Furniture Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv11711
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh
Defendant:
Liams Home Furniture Inc., Collins Movers Inc. and Francise Frederick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Jiang v. Kobe Japanese Steakhouse, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv11867
Defendant:
Kobe Japanese Steakhouse, Inc. formerly known as Tokyo Steak Hose Inc doing business as Tokyo Japanese Steak House, Guanglong Lin, Tokyo Steak Hose Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Chun Lin Jiang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Thorpe et al v. Exel Inc.
as 1:2022cv11033
Plaintiff:
Mark Thorpe, Nicholas Moon and LaToya Chavis-Burton
Defendant:
Exel Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain (USA)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fargo et al v City of Medford
as 1:2022cv11765
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Fargo, Kenneth Lanzilli, Paul Smith and others
Defendant:
City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Mattocks v. Bino, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv30131
Plaintiff:
Alivia Mattocks
Defendant:
Bino, Inc., Helen Santaniello, James Santaniello and others
Carr v. Unifirst Corporation
as 1:2022cv11500
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carr
Defendant:
Unifirst Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Deaver v. Homesite Group Incorporated
as 1:2022cv11416
Plaintiff:
Melissa Deaver
Defendant:
Homesite Group Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
