Cases 11 - 20 of 33
ANDREWS v. CROMEDY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv00181
Defendant:
CROMEDY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
BRYANT ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
FITCH v. GIANT EAGLE, INC.
as 2:2018cv01534
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FITCH, MICHAELLE HUTCHISON and RICHARD D'ALESSANDRO
Defendant:
GIANT EAGLE INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GUICE et al v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03379
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GUICE , STEVEN SCOTT , THOMAS PEDICORD and others
Defendant:
DIRECTV, LLC and DIRECTSAT, USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ANDREWS v. KH SENIOR CARE, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01614
Plaintiff:
KAREN ANDREWS
Defendant:
KH SENIOR CARE, LLC, KEVIN HERMAN, SANDC, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MARIN v. ANDREW JACOBS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01565
Plaintiff:
PEDRO MARIN
Defendant:
ANDREW JACOBS, INC., OSCAR BARRIOS and YIORGIS HATZINIKOLAO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ABOURAS et al v. KIELINSKI et al
as 5:2017cv00840
Plaintiff:
TAMER ABOURAS , CHRISTOPHER BARR , CLARK CELMAYSTER and others
Defendant:
ANN E. KIELINSKI , WALTER M. KIELINSKI , MERION MATTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WORLEY v. JAY DANA LLC
as 5:2017cv00425
Plaintiff:
ANDREW WORLEY
Defendant:
JAY DANA LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KOENIG v. PRIMANTI CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv01402
Plaintiff:
CHELSEA KOENIG
Defendant:
PRIMANTI CORPORATION, DAVID HEAD, ANDREW TAUB and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DAVIES-COLEMAN v. MCCOOL PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 5:2016cv04824
Plaintiff:
TAMI DAVIES-COLEMAN
Defendant:
MCCOOL PROPERTIES, LLC, ANDREW MCCOOL and CHRISTOPHER MCCOOL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LEFFLER v. CREATIVE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 5:2016cv01443
Plaintiff:
AUDREY LEFFLER
Defendant:
CREATIVE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ANDREW TRENTACOSTE, KATHY KUMITIS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
