Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Howell et al v. Lin
as 2:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Howell , Benjamin Baber , Kelton Day and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
West v. Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
Dinesheia West , Dorothy Jones , Myra Leonard and others
Defendant:
Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hawkins v. Texas Auto Crusher et al
as 4:2014cv01764
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hawkins and Antonio Page
Defendant:
Texas Auto Crusher , Murray Couch and Nora Couch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hurst et al v. Texas Auto Crushers, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00863
Plaintiff:
John Hurst , Johnny Hawkins and Antonio Page
Defendant:
Texas Auto Crushers, Inc., Murray Couch and Nora Couch
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Aguirre et al v. ISC Constructors, LLC
as 1:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
Victor Aguirre , All Plaintiffs , Raul Flores-Regino and others
Defendant:
ISC Constructors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hawkins v. Familia Dental Amarillo, PLLC.
as 2:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
Casie Hawkins
Defendant:
Familia Dental Amarillo, PLLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hawkins v. Accent Food Service, LLC
as 1:2013cv00276
Defendant:
Accent Food Service, LLC
Plaintiff:
Eric Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Hawkins v. Raytex Home Health Corporation
as 3:2012cv00967
Defendant:
Raytex Home Health Corporation
Plaintiff:
Karen Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Elliott et al v. Welcome House, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv02483
Plaintiff:
Lewis Elliott , Darrell Langley , Yolanda Holloway and others
Defendant:
Welcome House Inc and Don Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Roycroft v. Accent 51/49, Ltd. et al
as 1:2008cv00494
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Roycroft
Defendant:
Accent 51/49, Ltd. and Thomas L. Hawkins, III
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
