Cases 41 - 50 of 112
Yoo v. Studio of Master's Touch, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00281
Plaintiff:
Sung Teak Yoo
Defendant:
Studio of Master's Touch, Inc., David Jang and In Jae Moon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Kim v. Polo Deli, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv07389
Plaintiff:
Bu Sung Kim
Defendant:
Mi Kyung Kim, Sang Tae Kim and Polo Deli, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez et al v. 50 Food Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv07837
Plaintiff:
Esteban Perez , Felipe Galindo and Delfino Perez
Defendant:
50 Food Corp. and Andrew Sung
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SUNG v. VILLAGE SUPER MARKET OF NJ, LP et al
as 2:2017cv05033
Plaintiff:
JUNG-HUA SUNG
Defendant:
VILLAGE SUPER MARKET OF NJ, LP , VILLAGE SUPER MARKET INC. , TOM DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Kim et al
as 3:2017cv01067
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Beaverton Sushi Inc., Camas Sushi LLC, Green Lake Sushi LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Weddle et al v. SH LEE, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01432
Plaintiff:
Heather Weddle and John Arnold
Defendant:
SH LEE, LLC and Sung Ho Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dolores et al v. JSMC Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv04152
Plaintiff:
Eleazar Dolores and Moises Dolores
Defendant:
JSMC Corp., Hae Joo Minn and Sung Key Minn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Flores v. Battery Place Market Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv02611
Plaintiff:
Luis Flores
Defendant:
Battery Place Market Corp., Doe Corp., Vincente Milan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
KIM v. SGD DUBU LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01447
Plaintiff:
HWAN SUNG KIM and Jin Yong Shin
Defendant:
SGD DUBU LLC and JONG MIN NA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SHIN v. DONG HEA RESTAURANT (USA) CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv00525
Plaintiff:
JIN YONG SHIN
Defendant:
DONG HEA RESTAURANT (USA) CORP., SUNG M. PARK, KANG WON LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
