Cases 71 - 80 of 761
Diaz et al v. Amick Farms, LLC.
as 5:2022cv01246
Plaintiff:
Michael Diaz, Jean-Nichole Diaz and Diaz Family Farms, LLC.
Defendant:
Amick Farms, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Hoffman v. Courier Express Charlotte, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01188
Plaintiff:
Chandel Hoffman
Defendant:
Courier Express Charlotte, Inc. and Courier Express Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Stumpf v. Ronco Specialized Systems, Inc.
as 2:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stumpf
Defendant:
Ronco Specialized Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Beemer v. Clarendon County
as 2:2022cv01145
Plaintiff:
Abbey Beemer
Defendant:
Clarendon County
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Craven v. Mad Fish SC LLC
as 2:2022cv00935
Plaintiff:
Donald Nicholas Craven
Defendant:
Mad Fish SC LLC and Xin Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mello v. Edelen Brands LLC
as 4:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Brian Mello, Jr
Defendant:
Edelen Brands LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Craven v. FAMULARIS 002, LLC
as 2:2022cv00385
Plaintiff:
Donald Nicholas Craven
Defendant:
FAMULARIS 002, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Flemming v. Performance Chiropractic Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Mary Nicole Flemming
Defendant:
Performance Chiropractic Inc and Joseph Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Fox v. Gator-Strong LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Fox
Defendant:
Gator-Strong LLC and James Leone
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilkes v. McLeod Healthcare Network LLC
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Maya Wilkes
Defendant:
McLeod Healthcare Network LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
