Cases 81 - 90 of 5,196
Duncan v. MECHCO GROUP LLC
as 3:2022cv01557
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duncan
Defendant:
MECHCO GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Deakle, et al v. Grayson Air Conditioning, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Chase Deakle and Robert Stephens
Defendant:
Grayson Air Conditioning, Inc.
Scott v. Centick Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01451
Plaintiff:
Myesha Scott
Defendant:
Centick Enterprises, LLC and Enos Ngetich
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Anderson et al v. Imani Lounge, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
Iman Anderson, Seleta Stanton and Lakeisha Bristol
Defendant:
Imani Lounge, LLC and Michael Conway
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lopez-Reyes v. Halal Supermarket et al
as 2:2022cv01377
Plaintiff:
Vadim Lopez-Reyes
Defendant:
Halal Supermarket, Nabil Maflahi and Sadeq Maflahi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Patterson v. Wyatt Restaurant Group, LLC
as 1:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
LaShaun Patterson
Defendant:
Wyatt Restaurant Group, LLC and Wyatt Restaurant Group, LLC doing business as Church's Chicken
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rodgers v. City of Warrior
as 2:2022cv01305
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Rodgers
Defendant:
City of Warrior
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Moss v. Birmingham Jefferson County Transit Authority
as 2:2022cv01298
Plaintiff:
Mark Moss
Defendant:
Birmingham Jefferson County Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Combs v. Big Bang Enterprises Inc
as 1:2022cv01283
Plaintiff:
Timothy Combs
Defendant:
Big Bang Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tepole v. VL Construction, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01279
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Tepole
Defendant:
VL Construction, LLC and Valente Lambarria-Medina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
