Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Berry v. Drive Casa LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00433
Defendant:
Drive Casa LLC, Justin Cox and Mark Gallas
Plaintiff:
Crittenden Berry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Berry v. PreCC Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00440
Plaintiff:
Frank Berry
Defendant:
PreCC Inc and Anthony Urso
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bradbury et al v. Transglobal Services, LLC et al
as 7:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Berry, Josh Bradbury, Cynthia Broadway and others
Defendant:
Jeffery Colwell, John Ratliff and Transglobal Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jimenez v. Jim Berry Contractors, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00549
Plaintiff:
Cornelio Jimenez
Defendant:
Jim Berry Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Berry, et al v. JC Fodale Energy Services, LLC
as 5:2015cv00443
Plaintiff:
William Berry and William Carr
Defendant:
JC Fodale Energy Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Berry v. M2 Steel Systems, LLC
as 3:2014cv01001
Plaintiff:
Shane Berry
Defendant:
M2 Steel Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Berry v. Deering
as 3:2014cv00937
Plaintiff:
Shane Berry
Defendant:
Donald Deering
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gipson v. B&B Air Conditioning and Heating Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01309
Plaintiff:
Marcus Gipson
Defendant:
B&B Air Conditioning and Heating Service, Inc. and Troy Berry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilson et al v. Navika Capital Group, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv01569
Plaintiff:
Joanna Marie Wilson, Ashley Rachel DeLeon, Steve Vinkler and others
Defendant:
Navika Capital Group, LLC, Pearl Hospitality, LLC, Ruby Hospitality, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Berry v. Dril-Quip Inc.
as 4:2009cv03881
Plaintiff:
Ruben Gene Berry
Defendant:
Dril-Quip Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
